德國總理默茨（Friedrich Merz，梅爾茨）2月25至26日訪問中國。這是默茨去年5月上任後第一次訪華，也是繼法國總統馬克龍、愛爾蘭總理馬丁、芬蘭總理奧爾波和英國首相施紀賢之後，最近3個月內又一位訪問中國的歐洲國家領導人。
日头偏西。太阳也像一盏中号的圆宫灯，笑眯眯地坐在大杨树上、电线杆上，下边是一望无垠的麦子地，麦子仰视着高挂的红灯。。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法2026作为进阶阅读
。业内人士推荐搜狗输入法下载作为进阶阅读
Docker applies a default seccomp profile that blocks around 40 to 50 syscalls. This meaningfully reduces the attack surface. But the key limitation is that seccomp is a filter on the same kernel. The syscalls you allow still enter the host kernel’s code paths. If there is a vulnerability in the write implementation, or in the network stack, or in any allowed syscall path, seccomp does not help.，更多细节参见51吃瓜
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?